|
#1
|
|
|
Advertisement
There are now different limits to the number of checks you can make depending on how many chess pieces are used for checking. 1 piece - up to 3 checks 2 pieces - up to 5 checks 3 or more pieces - up to 7 checks Based on the limits above, you will lose if you check for the 4th, 6th and 8th time using 1 chess piece, 2 chess pieces or more than 3 chess pieces respectively. -- Update 3 Oct 2008 -- In this update, a checking move that also captures an enemy piece will reset the count for repeated checking. E.g. On your 2nd check, your chess piece captures an opponent piece but is also a check. The next check, which would have been considered the 3rd and thus getting a warning, will then be considered as the first check. | |
|
#2
|
|
|
Will there be a warning before you make the 4th, 6th
or 8th check? | |
|
#3
|
|
|
yes =D
| |
|
#4
|
|
|
please give warning if we in next move check will be lose, thanks
| |
|
#5
|
|
|
Please use the asian xiangqi rules. Some checks are allowed others are not allowed. 1 jiang 1 ting is draw. use ping to check all day long is legal. still got so many rules....
| |
|
#6
|
|
|
Dear Mr Admin,
Pls take not the Perpetual Checking Rules still lack ALOT of flexibility. In fact, it is sad that the system cannot differentiate between Perpetual Checking and Chain Kill (Lian Jiang) I've lost twice because of these checking restrictions. (Which I supposedly should have won in Real Life Chess Competition Rules) My very recent game, I should have won by a series of 10 continuous checks with 3 pieces. Hoever, I can never exceed the 7th check. I hope there will be proper rules in place. c l u b x i a n g q i . com is one website with excellent chess rules. No offence though. | |
|
#7
|
|
|
what does chain kill mean? checking that also captures an opponent piece?
| |
|
#8
|
|
![]() I would said this R&R was confusing and depress a lot of professional chinese chess player. | |
|
#9
|
|
|
Upzzz for change to the perpetual checking rule...
| |
|
#10
|
|
|
Quote:
coz u muz know tat for pro player, ending of games are brought by some continuos checks(of coz not repeated checks) as they can calculate more moves ahead,which more than what viwawa specified,so i would suggest admin try to study the real rules which provided by Mr Anderson and make viwawa games more realistic^^
| |
|
#11
|
|
|
it's helpful to the admin to be more specific. are you saying that the repeated checking is insufficient even with capturing of enemy pieces?
| |
|
#12
|
|
|
Hello there,
I want to complain about rules of you games. my ID is mk_david now i playing the dynasty chess with this person: angeline84. The problem is she set the games to 60min and when she start the games she don't want to move, just under thinking only. I facing this problem few time already, so when i quit the games lost the $$:@:@. So i suggest can you change the rules who don't move about 1 min consider lost the games. Hope can here you soon.:@ | |
|
#13
|
|
|
wat about Perpetual chase and repeated moves?
| |
|
#14
|
|
|
think viwawa should just employ asian chess rules...
simpler and more commonly used in competitions (think in sg at least) which can be used as a practice ground for most
| |
|
#15
|
|
|
Quote:
| |
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 03:10 AM.










